Talk:C^ backflip - Revision history

MMMMMMMMMMMMM: MMMMMMMMMMMMM moved page Talk:C^ Backflip to Talk:C^ backflip: sentence case manually due to annoying character

2021-05-11T01:32:48Z

MMMMMMMMMMMMM moved page Talk:C^ Backflip to Talk:C^ backflip: sentence case manually due to annoying character

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:32, 11 May 2021
(No difference)

Nim at 20:24, 17 April 2019

2019-04-17T20:24:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 17 April 2019
Line 4:		Line 4:
	== Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into [[Common TASing Techniques]]? ==		== Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into [[Common TASing Techniques]]? ==

	title[[User:Nim\|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim\|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)		title [[User:Nim\|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim\|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nim: /* Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into Common TASing Techniques? */ new section

2019-04-17T20:24:46Z

Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into Common TASing Techniques?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 17 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot\|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot\|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)		I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot\|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot\|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
	::Old post, but I agree. [[User:Nim\|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim\|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)		::Old post, but I agree. [[User:Nim\|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim\|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

			== Should this and similar TAS techniques be merged into [[Common TASing Techniques]]? ==

			title[[User:Nim\|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim\|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Nim at 20:24, 17 April 2019

2019-04-17T20:24:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:24, 17 April 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot\|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot\|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)		I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot\|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot\|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
			::Old post, but I agree. [[User:Nim\|Nim]] ([[User talk:Nim\|talk]]) 20:24, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Bad boot: Created page with "I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, som..."

2018-06-19T22:25:03Z

Created page with "I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, som..."

New page

I think our policy regarding attributing glitches to specific people should be to only do it when the history is interesting or relevant to the glitch itself. For example, someone who visits the Pedro spot page will want to know where the name comes from, so we should give a very brief explanation. Here, it's not important or interesting that Plush discovered the glitch, so I don't think we should attribute it. Thoughts? [[User:Bad boot|Bad boot]] ([[User talk:Bad boot|talk]]) 22:24, 19 June 2018 (UTC)